The starting point of the discussion is Kant’s critical claim, no other cognition of the soul is possible, but on the grounds of experience. (1) h e main limitation of empirical psychology in Kant’s view is, it can only describe the inner appearances, being unable to explain them. It includes no apodictic laws or principles. (2) On the other hand, we can in Kant’s opinion explain the psychic phenomena, assuming they are physically determined. The philosopher approaches in this way especially paranormal psychic phenomena and mental illnesses. In this naturalistic approach Kant is governed by the practical intention, to help people sufering from paranormal or abnormal mental states. (3) Nevertheless he takes into account also the psychological conditions of psychic appearances, endowing man with the ability to shape his soul with his mental forces. In both approaches Kant is governed in author’s view mainly by pragmatic grounds. One can take advantage of the inner experience in shaping his psyche, improving his mental capacities. One can also theoretically proift from it in philosophical rel ection. But self-observing alone leads one easily astray. (4) Finally, the author rel ects upon Kant’s critical theory of mind as psychology, recalling philosopher’s remarks about immanent psychology. In author’s view the critical theory of mind qua immanent psychology is embedded both in rational (a priori) and empirical cognition of the soul, aiming at dividing one from another.
The journal founded by Leszek Kołakowski, Bronisław Baczko and Jan Garewicz appears continuously since 1957.