Thomas Paine penned Agrarian Justice in France in 1796, after the proclamation of the Constitution of the Year III, amidst the post-Thermidorian maelstrom. His last great pamphlet calls for redistributive taxation of the wealthy and the landlords for the benefit of the poor and the dispossessed. The article will reconstruct Paine’s proposition and dissect its argumentative structure. It will be argued that Paine, unwittingly, shifts from natural law argument (agrarian justice as compensation for forfeiting man’s inalienable entitlement to the portion of arable land, stemming from the original community of property ordained by God) towards deontological arguments (unconditional ground rent as an act of compensatory justice for the victims of civilizational progress, not as an act of charity), supplemented with utilitarian arguments (alleviating misery of the masses, providing security buffer for the rich by curtailing revolutionary anarchy). The article will also trace down the origins of Paine’s philosophical stance (tradition of English radicalism and Quakers egalitarianism, Locke’s liberalism). In the concluding part, the reception of Paine’s ideas (regarding unconditional ground rent and common property of land and resources) will be touched upon.
Andrzej Karalus – Ph.D., Assistant Professor at the Chair of Social and Philosophical Sciences, Gdansk University of Technology. He is interested in contemporary political philosophy, contemporary American and continental (mainly German) philosophy, socialphilosophy, theory of social change and political economy.
The journal founded by Leszek Kołakowski, Bronisław Baczko and Jan Garewicz appears continuously since 1957.